|
Court rules HIV not proven to cause 'AIDS'.
After years of claims by the AIDS
establishment that a link between HIV and immune supression had been
established a High Court found the claim without merit and a unfounded
deception. This is the first legal trail of the HUV/AIDS hypothesis and
a historic defeat for AID$ Inc.
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson The United Nations Centre for Human Rights, United Nations Office at Geneva
8-14 Avenue de la Paix
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland To all Heads of Government and all Heads of State To all NGOs
Legal proceedings against the "Deutscher Bundestag", the Parliament of
the Federal Republic of Germany: Because of the intentional
continuation of acts of killing and manslaughter (§ 220a StGB Germany)
by the German Parliament. During the last six years proofs have been collected for the following actions that have taken place inside Germany:
The State intentionally is using non-valid tests to persuade healthy
persons to take a deadly long-term medication. The persons, being
healthy before being tested die during the long-term-medication. The
German Parliament, since years intentionally is securing that this
crime continues. Course of Events on January 15th 2001 at the District Court (Landgericht) of Dortmund:
Judge Hackmann announced the statement of the
"Bundesgesundheitsbehörde", the Federal German Health Authorities,
which says that in connection with AIDS there has never been isolated a
virus (Dr. Marcus, Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI) Berlin). The judge
figured out that the German Bundestag had been backing the lie of the
Federal Health Authorities (RKI, Dr. Marcus, 9.3.95) about a successful
isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS in the course of a
petition (Art. 17, Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany,
Pet. 5-13-15-2002-010526). The trial was based
on actions of the defendant which were caused by the misleading
statement made by the RKI (Dr. Marcus) on the 9th March 1995, that
there were photographs of the isolated HI-virus inside the publications
of Montagnier (1983) and Gallo (1984). The judge proved the
untruthfulness of this statement using Dr. Marcus‘ statement itself.
The court imposed a suspended sentence of 8 months of jail because of
attempted coercion of the authorities to adhere and act according to
law and order. The document of the German
Bundestag DS 12/8591 holds proof that the Bundestag had already known
in 1994 that neither Montagnier (1983) nor Gallo (1984) had isolated
any virus in connection with AIDS. Based on this the Bundestag
safeguarded the persistent lie of the AIDS information campaign (RKI)
from 9th March 1995 about the successful isolation of a virus in
connection with AIDS. As a consequence of non-tolerating this lie and
because of non-tolerating the deadly consequences of this lie, the
trial took place on 15th January 2001. It is
impossible – as far as laboratory conditions are concerned – to develop
a valid Virus-antibody-test, if the virus has not been isolated before.
Every layman understands that an individual proof for an infection with
a virus is impossible, if the existence of the virus has never been
generally proven. This knowledge of the German health authorities, that
the tests are not validated, can be proven via the authorities‘
documents themselves. The error concerning the test’s validity is
spread and supported by the authorities – against better knowledge.
With two more petitions the Bundestag safeguarded the default of the
responsible authorities, not to carry out the law (§63 AMG, Stufenplan
II), to do studies and observations to protect persons taking the
AIDS-Medicine, the chemotherapy AZT (Pet. 5-13-15-2002-058744 and Pet.
5-13-15-212-023567a). The health authorities
and the Bundestag know that there will be no test method to prove an
HIV-Infection, as long as HIV has not been isolated. And there is no
doubt that AZT – as well as the HIV-medications in general – are deadly
themselves when used as long-term-medication.
In the course of the proceedings of the petitions the Bundestag created
an apparent peace of law – by means of deliberately untruthful
statements. President of the German Parliament Wolfgang Thierse regards
untruthful behaviour of this kind (as shown by the Bundestag) as being
justified by the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional
Court). A videotape documenting an interview (28th June 1995) shows
that his predecessor in office, Prof. Rita Süssmuth did know, that
there had never been any proofs for a virus in connection with AIDS and
that there are no proofs for the claims of infectivitiy.
Still pending in the Bundestag is the petition Pet. 2-14-15-212-02608.
It is lodging a complaint against the legal authorities, which stayed
passive after getting the attention of the proofs for these act of
killings. Enclosed with the complaint were so many proofs, which had
made it necessary for the Bundestag to take actions right after
perusal, to stop the continuation of these acts of killings by the
state. Within the last six months every single member of the German
Bundestag was informed six times via mail about these acts of killing
by the state. The intention of the German
Bundestag to safeguard killings by the state after gaining insight into
the facts must be regarded as proven, especially because of the fact
that several petitions were rejected by means of untruthful statements.
The German Bundestag and every individual member of the Bundestag
intentionally safeguards acts of killings by the state by deliberately
misleading the public. Healthy people are intentionally lead into a
deadly medication via tests with invalid results - and then die.
The criminal law of the BRD and especially § 220a StGB (Genocide)
protects citizens from act of killings organised by a state which is
deliberately misleading the public. It also protects the citizens
binding the legal authorities to take actions after perusal. The
prosecuting attorneys attended the trial on 15th January 2001 at the
Landgericht Dortmund and learned about the facts – in front of the
public. Their passivity afterwards serves as a further proof for their
further intention in this matter. (LG Dortmund, Ns 70 Js 878/99
14(XVII) K 11/00) Karl Krafeld and Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dortmund and Stuttgart, 14.3.2001 Science, Medicine and Human Rights (Wissenschaft, Medizin und Menschenrechte e.V.), Germany
Albrechtstr. 17, D-44137 Dortmund, 0711 2220601, Lanka@free.de for other studing of hiv and aids you can see this very intresting site: http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/epapadopoulos.htm
or the forum http://www.aidsRC.org
Author: Paul King
Link: www.aidsRC.org
Posted: Saturday June 21, 2003 04:28 PM
[ignore Paul King]
[read more Paul King]
[add Paul King to my favorites]
[search for Paul King on Google]
| 
